150,000 Abstracts Show Signs of AI Involvement

Since ChatGPT’s release, AI use in academic writing has skyrocketed. Over 10% of biomedical paper abstracts on PubMed may be AI-written.

That’s 150,000+ papers every year suspected of AI assistance.

Detection tools can’t keep up. Average accuracy is just 50–60%—often mistaking human writing for AI.

AI-generated content can easily avoid detection using synonym replacement and sentence restructuring.

Non-native English writers are more likely to be flagged— even when writing their own work.

AI tools aren't all bad. They help researchers focus more on science, not English grammar.

The real solution? Fix the academic system—not just the tools. Shift focus from quantity to quality.